LogoLogo
District of Columbia
District of Columbia
  • District of Columbia’s Opioid Settlements
  • Decision Making
    • 90-100% Opioid Abatement Fund
    • 0-10% Litigation Support Fund
  • Community Access
  • Advisory Bodies
  • Additional Resources
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

© Vital Strategies and OpioidSettlementTracker.com

On this page
  • Where do these monies live?
  • What can this share be spent on?
  • Who ultimately decides how to spend this share (and how)?
  • Are supplantation uses prohibited for this share?
  • Can I see how this share has been spent?
  • What else should I know?
  • Citations
Export as PDF
  1. Decision Making

0-10% Litigation Support Fund

Previous90-100% Opioid Abatement FundNextCommunity Access

Last updated 5 months ago

Where do these monies live?

The D.C. Attorney General may retain a maximum of 10% D.C.’s opioid settlement funds in the if the Attorney General gives the Mayor, Chief Financial Officer, and D.C. Council written notice.[1]

What can this share be spent on?

Litigation Support Fund monies may only be spent on:

  • Litigation expenses[2]

  • Personnel costs (up to $7 million annually)[3]

  • Non-personnel costs related to the administration of specified grant initiatives[4]

  • “Crime reduction, violence interruption, and other public safety initiatives”[5]

In a , D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine described the Litigation Support Fund as allowing his office to “use the proceeds from our lawsuits and reinvest them in the community,” stating that they will “use the money to build up our legal efforts and contribute $7 million annually towards the city’s violence prevention efforts.”[6]

Who ultimately decides how to spend this share (and how)?

D.C. Attorney General decides. The Litigation Support Fund is administered by the .[7]

Are supplantation uses prohibited for this share?

No, supplantation is not prohibited. D.C. law does not explicitly prohibit supplantation uses of opioid settlement funds from its Litigation Support Fund. This means that up to 10% of D.C.’s opioid settlement funds may be spent in ways that replace (or “supplant”) — rather than supplement — existing resources.

Can I see how this share has been spent?

No (neither public nor intrastate reporting required). Opioid settlement expenditures are not officially published in a centralized location for this share.

What else should I know?

Not applicable.

Citations

  1. D.C. Code Secs. 1-301.86b(d)(3)(D), 7-3221(e)(1)-(2). ↑

  2. D.C. Code Sec. 1-301.86b(c)(1)(A) (“Supporting general litigation expenses associated with prosecuting or defending litigation matters on behalf of the District of Columbia”). ↑

  3. D.C. Code Sec. 1-301.86b(c)(1)(B) (“Funding staff positions, personnel costs, and employee retirement and separation incentives, up to a maximum amount of $7 million per year”). ↑

  4. D.C. Code Sec. 1-301.86b(c)(1)(B) (“non-personnel costs related to administering any grant issued pursuant to the authority provided in §§ 1-301.88f(a) and 1-301.88g(a)”). ↑

  5. D.C. Code Secs. 1-301.86b(c)(1)(C) (“Crime reduction and violence interruption programming”), (c)(2) (“Beginning in Fiscal Year 2020, up to $9 million deposited into the Fund each fiscal year may be used for the purposes of crime reduction, violence interruption, and other public safety initiatives”). ↑

  6. D.C. Code Sec. 1-301.86b(a). ↑

Visit OpioidSettlementTracker.com’s for an updated collection of states’ and localities’ available expenditure reports.

. District of Columbia Office of Attorney General. December 2022. Accessed August 14, 2024. ↑

Litigation Support Fund
December 2022 report
D.C. Attorney General’s Office
Expenditure Report Tracker
Breaking Ground: Building the First Independent Office of Attorney General
Page cover image