15% State Share
Last updated
Last updated
Fifteen percent (15%) of the state’s opioid litigation proceeds are held in the Opioid Abatement Account and appropriated to state agencies.[1]
Note: Texas’ allocations of settlement funds between this Opioid Abatement Account and its Opioid Abatement Trust (which contains the state’s two other shares) are often settlement-specific.[2] See for more information.
This share must be spent on a list of approved uses described in state law:[3]
prevention (“such as school-based prevention”)
efforts to “prevent or reduce deaths … from opioid-related harms” (including making naloxone available to a wide-ranging list of eligible recipients)[4]
training on OUD treatment (including “medical detoxification” and “diversion control,” among other “best practices”)[5]
OUD treatment, “with an emphasis on programs that provide a continuum of care”
access to medication (including opioid agonists, partial agonists, and antagonists)
efforts to reduce the “abuse or misuse” of prescription medications[6]
support for treatment alternatives (including “mobile health services and telemedicine … in rural areas”)[7]
efforts to address the needs of people involved in the criminal legal system
and a catch-all category to “further any other purpose related to opioid abatement authorized by appropriation”[8]
No, supplantation is not prohibited. Like most states, Texas does not explicitly prohibit supplantation uses of its opioid settlement funds. This means that the 15% local share may be spent in ways that replace (or “supplant”) — rather than supplement — existing resources.
No (neither public nor intrastate reporting required). Opioid settlement expenditures are not officially published in a centralized location for this share.[10]
Not applicable.
Tex. Gov’t Code Secs. 403.505(a) (describing dedicated account in the general revenue which is administered by the Comptroller) and 403.505(b) (“The account is composed of … money obtained from a statewide opioid settlement agreement and deposited in the account under Section 403.507”); Tex. Gov’t Code Sec. 403.507(b)(1) (“Of money obtained under a statewide opioid settlement agreement[,] 15 percent shall be deposited into the [Opioid Abatement] account”); Tex. Gov’t Code Sec. 403.505(c) (“Money in the account may be appropriated only to a state agency for the abatement of opioid-related harms”). ↑
See Tex. Gov’t Code Sec. 403.507(c) (“For the purposes of a statewide opioid settlement agreement in relation to a bankruptcy plan for a released entity, money is distributed in accordance with the bankruptcy plan”). ↑
Tex. Gov’t Code Sec. 403.505(d) (“A state agency may use money appropriated from the account only to…”) and Sec. 403.505(d)(1)-(9) (listing acceptable Opioid Abatement Account uses for this share). ↑
Including healthcare providers, first responders, people experiencing an overdose, families, schools, community-based service providers, social workers, or “other members of the public.” Tex. Gov’t Code Sec. 403.505(d)(2)(A)-(H). ↑
Tex. Gov’t Code Sec. 403.505(d)(3). ↑
Tex. Gov’t Code Sec. 403.505(d)(6). ↑
Tex. Gov’t Code Sec. 403.505(d)(7). ↑
Tex. Gov’t Code Sec 403.505(d)(9). ↑
State legislature and state agencies decide. The appropriates funds from this share to state agencies for spending on the nine approved strategies described above.[9]
Visit OpioidSettlementTracker.com’s for an updated collection of states’ and localities’ available expenditure reports.
Tex. Gov’t Code Sec. 403.505(c)-(d). The State of Texas has disagreed with this categorization in its communications with Vital Strategies and OpioidSettlementTracker.com. See . The second item of the nine — efforts to “prevent or reduce deaths … from opioid-related harms” (including the provision of naloxone) — anticipates a wide-ranging list of potential partners for this goal: healthcare providers, first responders, people experiencing an overdose, families, schools, community-based service providers, social workers, or “other members of the public.” Sec. 403.505(d)(2)(A)-(H). See for more. ↑
The State of Texas has disagreed with this categorization in its communications with Vital Strategies and OpioidSettlementTracker.com. See . ↑