Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Here are the entities that ultimately decide how each of Utahâs opioid settlement shares are spent:
50% state share: Utah state legislature
50% local share: county officials
Yes. The Utah Opioid Task Forceâs 17-member Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee (OSAC) is tasked with providing guidance on effective uses of opioid settlement funds to state and local leaders.[1] The OSAC is part of the Utah Opioid Task Force, which was formed within the Utah Attorney Generalâs office in 2017.[2]
Not applicable. There are no formal legal mechanisms governing the composition or operation of the OSAC, meaning there are no specific requirements to include members with specific types of expertise or experience.
The OSAC currently has 17 members and is comprised of experts from a range of fields related to the overdose crisis, e.g., public health, harm reduction, justice system, pharmacy, lived experience.[3] Current OSAC members can be found on the Utah Opioid Task Forceâs website.
No (up to each locality). Local governments in Utah are not required to establish opioid settlement advisory bodies. However, localities may choose to establish advisory councils that include members with lived and/or living experience to help ensure that settlement spending reflects community priorities.
Not applicable.
See . Utah Opioid Task Force website. Accessed September 1, 2024. See also . Utah Opioid Task Force Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee. January 2024. Accessed September 1, 2024 (âThe [Committee] is composed of subject matter experts from a broad range of fields and has the singular task of providing guidance on utilizing settlement funds expected from various opioid litigationsâ). â
Utah Opioid Task Force website. Accessed September 1, 2024. â
See Utah Opioid Task Force Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee. January 2024. Accessed September 1, 2024. ("Areas of expertise represented include: Treatment and Recovery, Addiction Medicine, Treatment Systems, Public Health, Harm Reduction, Law Enforcement/Public Safety, Legal and Justice Systems, Pharmacy, Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT), Health Systems, Education, Public Policy, Opioid Overdose Prevention, Family Members, and Lived Experience with Substance Useâ). â
This Community Guide will describe how Utah is spending its opioid settlements and whether Utah is working to ensure community access to opioid settlement funds. Last revised September 1, 2024.
County officials
Decision-making Process
The Utah state legislatureâs appropriates funds from this share based on input from the .
Counties decide autonomously but must report planned uses to the state.
Supplantation
Prohibited
Prohibited
Grant Funding
No
Up to each locality (availability and processes will vary)
Public Input
Yes (not required, but see )
Up to each locality (not required)
Advisory Body
Yes (not required, but see Utahâs Opioid Task Forceâs (OSAC)).
There are no formal legal mechanisms that govern the OSACâs composition or require it to include member(s) with lived and/or living experience.
Up to each locality (not required)
Expenditures
Public reporting required. View appropriations and annual reports on the Department of Health & Human Servicesâ page.
Public reporting required (but not yet available). Bookmark the Utah Opioid Task Forceâs website and Department of Health & Human Servicesâ page.
Updates
For updates on the state share, visit the Utah Opioid Task Forceâs website, which links to the . You can also review the Utah Office of Substance Use and Mental Healthâs website, which contains information on legislative sessions and approved funding and links to its .
For resources on local share programming, visit the Utah Association of Countiesâ page. For other updates on the local share, check the websites for your county commission or local health department.
$520.8 million[1]
[1] Total is rounded. See . Accessed September 1, 2024.
50% to the state and 50% to local governments
State-Local Agreement (); Legislation (and )
Ultimate Decisionmaker
50% state share: Yes (not required). Though the state is not required to seek public input on uses of this share, the Utah Opioid Task Forceâs Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee is conducting an ongoing survey âto understand the communityâs perspective on how to best address the [overdose] crisis.â[1]
50% local share: Up to each locality (not required). Local governments are not required to seek public input on uses of their shares. However, each may choose to seek such input. Watch for opportunities to weigh in on city and county spending decisions, such as city council meetings and town halls. Contact information for Utahâs cities and towns is available here.[2]
It depends. As of September 1, 2024, the state has not established any grant opportunities for the 50% state share. Local governments may create grant programs to distribute funds from the 50% local share. The existence, parameters, and processes for local settlement grant programs will vary by locality, so stay alert for new opportunities. Visit (OpioidSettlementTracker.com and Legal Action Center) for the most up-to-date information on settlement grant opportunities for community organizations.
For updates on the state share, visit the Utah Opioid Task Forceâs website, which links to the . You can also review the Utah Office of Substance Use and Mental Healthâs website, which contains information on legislative sessions and approved funding and links to its .
For updates on the local share, visit the Utah Association of Countiesâ .[3] For other updates on the local share, check the websites for your county commission or local health department.
Not applicable.
Survey accessed September 1, 2024. â
âThe state of Utah and its counties agreed to a 50/50 split of Utahâs settlement funds between the state and participating counties. Each county is responsible for planning and tracking their funds, please seek more information on their plans through the county commissioners for any county. Utah Department of Health & Human Services website. Accessed September 1, 2024. â
âUAC does not have any official authority over the opioid settlement or how counties use their money. UAC does not receive any portion of the opioid settlement. Money is not passed through UAC to the counties but instead comes directly from the National Settlement Fund Administrator BrownGreer.â . Utah Association of Counties. December 2023. Accessed September 1, 2024. â
Utah Opioid Crisis Response Blueprint (January 2024)
Office of Substance Use and Mental Health:
Funding Approved in
, incl.
(December 2023)

This share is distributed directly to participating counties according to Exhibit B of Utahâs MOU.[1] Counties can work with their constituent municipalities to allocate their county shares amongst themselves âin any manner they choose,â[2] with each able to combine funds with surrounding local governments to jointly provide services.[3]
With limited exceptions,[4] this share must be spent on the approved uses described in Exhibit A of Utahâs MOU,[5] which is identical to the national settlement agreementâs (non-exhaustive) Exhibit E and includes prevention, harm reduction, treatment, recovery, and other strategies. Reimbursement uses of opioid settlement funds are prohibited statewide.[6]
The Utah Opioid Task Forceâs Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee has created a Utah Opioid Crisis Response Blueprint that identifies priorities, includes subject matter expert-recommended strategies, and is intended to âassist ... state and local communities in utilizing fundsâ without requiring their specific uses.[7]
Counties decide autonomously (but must report planned uses). Decisionmakers for the counties will ultimately decide for themselves how to spend their monies on approved uses,[8] and county legislative bodies (i.e., council or commission) have final say over how these shares are spent.[9] However, settling local governments must annually file proposed plans describing anticipated uses of funds with the Utah Association of Counties.[10] Counties must also report their expenditures, among other items, to the Department of Health and Human Servicesâ Office of Substance Use and Mental Health.[11]
Yes, supplantation is prohibited. Utah state law explicitly prohibits supplantation uses of state and local opioid settlement funds.[12] This means that Utahâs opioid settlement funds only be spent in ways that supplement â rather than replace (or âsupplantâ) â existing state or local government resources.
Yes (public reporting required). View DHHSâ annual reports on its page.[13] DHHS must publish detailed expenditure reporting on its website for both the state and local shares.[14] Legislative changes in 2024 increased the level of required detail in these reports.[15]
Visit OpioidSettlementTracker.comâs for an updated collection of statesâ and localitiesâ available expenditure reports.
Not applicable.
3 (50% of the Settlement Funds shall be allocated to the Settling Party Countiesâ), (defining Settling Party Counties to mean counties that have accepted a settlement and are signatories to the MOU), and (âThe Settling Party Local Governmentsâ Share shall be distributed by the National Settlement Fund Administrator directly to each settling County pursuant to the percentages set forth in Exhibit Bâ). See also . Utah Association of Counties (UAC). Updated July 2023. Accessed August 27, 2024. â
. â
âCounties can combine their funds with surrounding counties or municipalities to provide combined services in the region.â See
The Opioid Litigation Proceeds Restricted Account holds 50% of Utahâs opioid settlement funds and is distributed to state agencies.[1]
With limited exceptions,[2] this share must be spent on the approved uses described in of Utahâs MOU,[3] which is identical to the national settlement agreementâs (non-exhaustive) and includes prevention, harm reduction, treatment, recovery, and other strategies. Reimbursement uses of opioid settlement funds are prohibited statewide.[4]
The Utah Opioid Task Forceâs has created a that identifies priorities, includes subject matter expert-recommended strategies, and is intended to âassist ... state and local communities in utilizing fundsâ without requiring specific uses.[5]
Opioid Task Force and Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee recommend, state legislature decides. The ultimately decides specific appropriations of the Opioid Litigation Proceeds Restricted Account.[6]
As described by the state in an , the writes appropriations of funds into the budget with âguidance through the
MOU 4.2 (providing that local governmentsâ shares are distributed directly to each participating county or to the âUtah attorney fee and expense fund established in Section 6â), MOU 6 (requiring creation of âUtah attorney fee and expense fundâ funded by localitiesâ shares without requiring a specific percentage set-aside), and MOU 7.4 (âOut of any Settlement Funds, administrative expenses shall not exceed 1% of the Settlement Funds recovered by the State or any Settling Partyâ). See also Distributor Settlement Agreement I.SS (âExhibit E provides a non-exhaustive list of expenditures that qualify as being paid for Opioid Remediation. Qualifying expenditures may include reasonable related administrative expensesâ). â
MOU 2.2 (defining âApproved Usesâ to mean âthose uses identified in Exhibit A, Opioid Settlement Funds â Approved Usesâ) and MOU 3.1 (âAll Settlement Funds, other than those directed to attorney fees and costs, regardless of allocation, shall be utilized consistent with the Approved Usesâ). See also Distributor Settlement Agreement I.SS (âExhibit E provides a non-exhaustive list of expenditures that qualify as being paid for Opioid Remediation. Qualifying expenditures may include reasonable related administrative expensesâ). â
Utah Code Ann. Sec. 26B-5-211(1)(b) (defining âopioid fundsâ to mean both the state and political subdivisionsâ monies) and Sec. 26B-5-211(2)(a) (âOpioid funds may not be used to ⌠reimburse expenditures that were incurred before the opioid funds were received by the governmental entityâ). â
Utah Opioid Crisis Response Blueprint. Utah Opioid Task Force, Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee. January 2024. Accessed August 27, 2024 (âThe [Committee] is composed of subject matter experts from a broad range of fields and has the singular task of providing guidance on utilizing settlement funds expected from various opioid litigationsâ). â
MOU 3.1 and 3.3 (describing Settling Party Countiesâ direct receipt of their allocations for uses consistent with approved uses). See also County Opioid Settlement Funds FAQs. UAC. December 2023. Accessed August 27, 2024 (âThe State cannot direct counties to use their opioid settlement funds in any wayâ). The same resource goes on to advise that â[i]f you have questions about how to use your opioid funds, please consult with your County Commission/Council, your County Sheriff, your County Attorney, and your Local Mental Health/Substance Use Authorityâ). â
Opioid Settlements 101. UAC. Accessed August 27, 2024. (âWho gets the final say in how to spend the funds?â âThe county legislative body, i.e. the Council or Commission. But attorneys, law enforcement, and behavioral health professionals should provide input and help to guide the decisionâ). â
MOU 7.2. For more explanation, see UACâs County Opioid Settlement Funds FAQs (âUAC does not have any official authority over the opioid settlement or how counties use their money. UAC does not receive any portion of the opioid settlement. Money is not passed through UAC to the counties but instead comes directly from the National Settlement Fund Administrator BrownGreer. UAC was selected by the Utah County and District Attorneys Association to be the reporting Administrator as detailed in the MOUâ). Note that the MOU refers simply to âthe Administratorâ and does not offer additional detail. â
Utah Code Ann. Sec. 26B-5-211(4)-(5) (requiring political subdivisions to annually report several measures to the DHHS Office of Substance Use and Mental Health). This statute, enacted after the MOU, ostensibly supersedes the expenditure reporting requirements in MOU 7.3 (requiring Settling Party Local Governments to report their Distributor and Janssen expenditures to the âAdministrator,â which subsequent guidance identifies as the Utah Association of Counties); see County Opioid Settlement Funds FAQs. UAC. December 2023. Accessed August 27, 2024 (âThe MOU does not identify an Administrator to report to. The Utah County and District Attorneys Association suggested that UAC should act as the reporting Administratorâ). â
Utah Code Ann. Sec. 26B-5-211(1)(b) (defining âopioid fundsâ to include opioid settlement funds received by the state or a political subdivision), (2)(b) (providing that âopioid fundsâ may not be used to âsupplant or take the place of any funds that would otherwise have been expended for that purposeâ). See also Utah Code Ann. Sec. 26B-5-211(6)(e) (requiring the Utah Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Substance Use and Mental Healthâs annual opioid settlement report to include âa description of any finding or concern as to whether all opioid funds disbursed from the restricted account violated the prohibitionsâ against supplantation). â
See, e.g., Annual Opioid Litigation Funding Report. Utah Department of Health and Human Services. September 30, 2024. Accessed September 1, 2024. â
Utah Code Ann. Sec. 26B-5-211(6)-(7) (outlining the requirements for expenditure reporting submitted to the legislature by the DHHS Office of Substance Use and Mental Health to be made public on the DHHS website). See also Utah Code Ann. Sec. 26B-5-211(1)(b) (defining âopioid fundsâ to include opioid settlement funds received by the state or a political subdivision). â
2024 UT SB 261 (with an effective date of May 1, 2024). â
For fiscal year 2024, the legislature appropriated $2.8 million from this share to the Utah Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) for âintegrated healthcare services.â[8]
Yes, supplantation is prohibited. Utah state law explicitly prohibits supplantation uses of state and local opioid settlement funds.[9] This means that Utahâs opioid settlement funds only be spent in ways that supplement â rather than replace (or âsupplantâ) â existing state or local government resources.
Yes (public reporting required). View DHHSâ annual reports on its Opioid Litigation page.[10] DHHS must publish detailed expenditure reporting on its website for both the state and local shares.[11] Legislative changes in 2024 increased the level of required detail in these reports.[12]
Visit OpioidSettlementTracker.comâs Expenditure Report Tracker for an updated collection of statesâ and localitiesâ available expenditure reports.
Not applicable.
One Utah Opioid Settlement Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) 3.2 (â50% of the Settlement Funds shall be allocated to the State (âState Shareâ)â), MOU 4.1 (âThe State Share shall be deposited by the National Settlement Fund Administrator into the Opioid Litigation Settlement Restricted Account and disbursed pursuant to the terms of that statuteâ). Utah Code Ann. Sec. 51-9-801(1) (creating Opioid Litigation Proceeds Restricted Account within the general fund). â
MOU 7.4 (âOut of any Settlement Funds, administrative expenses shall not exceed 1% of the Settlement Funds recovered by the State or any Settling Partyâ) and MOU 6.3 (âno portion of the State Share shall be used for the payment of Settling Party Local Government attorney fees and no portion of the State Share shall be used to established the Utah Fundâ). See also Distributor Settlement Agreement I.SS (âExhibit E provides a non-exhaustive list of expenditures that qualify as being paid for Opioid Remediation. Qualifying expenditures may include reasonable related administrative expensesâ). â
(defining âApproved Usesâ to mean âthose uses identified in Exhibit A, Opioid Settlement Funds â Approved Usesâ) and (âAll Settlement Funds, other than those directed to attorney fees and costs, regardless of allocation, shall be utilized consistent with the Approved Usesâ). See also I.SS (âExhibit E provides a non-exhaustive list of expenditures that qualify as being paid for Opioid Remediation. Qualifying expenditures may include reasonable related administrative expensesâ). â
Utah Code Ann. Sec. 26B-5-211(1)(b) (defining âopioid fundsâ to mean both the state and political subdivisionsâ monies) and Sec. 26B-5-211(2)(a) (âOpioid funds may not be used to ⌠reimburse expenditures that were incurred before the opioid funds were received by the governmental entityâ). â
. Utah Opioid Task Force, Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee. January 2024. Accessed August 27, 2024 (âThe [Committee] is composed of subject matter experts from a broad range of fields and has the singular task of providing guidance on utilizing settlement funds expected from various opioid litigationsâ). â
Utah Code Ann. Sec. 51-9-801(4) (money in the Opioid Litigation Proceeds Restricted Account is â[s]ubject to appropriation by the Legislatureâ). See also (âThe State Share shall be ⌠disbursed pursuant to the terms of th[e Opioid Litigation Settlement Restricted Account] statuteâ). See also . Utah Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Accessed August 27, 2024 (â[F]unding decisions at the state level [are] being made by the legislative appropriation processâ). â
. Utah Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed August 27, 2024 (âThe funds are allocated through the Social Services Appropriations Committee with guidance through the Opioid Task Force and the Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee. While not given a formal role in the settlement spending process by the stateâs legislation or memorandum of understanding, the Opioid Settlement Advisory Committee, a subcommittee of the Utah Opioid Task Force that was formed by the state attorney general in 2017, has created a with high-level spending recommendations for both county and state policymakers. Ultimately the Legislature's Executive Appropriation Committee determines how much funding will be allocated to identified programs and projects from the Opioid Litigation Settlement Restricted Accountâ). Cf . Utah Association of Counties. December 2023. Accessed August 27, 2024 (âThe State can only access its own money through Legislation. The Social Services Appropriations Subcommittee discusses what to do with the money during the Legislative Session and then writes it into the budget. The Office of Substance Use and Mental Health, the Opioid Task Force, and other entities can suggest to the Subcommittee what state opioid settlement monies should be used forâ). â
, Item 104. â
Utah Code Ann. Sec. 26B-5-211(1)(b) (defining âopioid fundsâ to include opioid settlement funds received by the state or a political subdivision), (2)(b) (providing that âopioid fundsâ may not be used to âsupplant or take the place of any funds that would otherwise have been expended for that purposeâ). See also Utah Code Ann. Sec. 26B-5-211(6)(e) (requiring the Utah Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Substance Use and Mental Healthâs annual opioid settlement report to include âa description of any finding or concern as to whether all opioid funds disbursed from the restricted account violated the prohibitionsâ against supplantation). â
See, e.g., . Utah Department of Health and Human Services. September 30, 2023. Accessed September 1, 2024. â
Utah Code Ann. Sec. 26B-5-211(6)-(7) (outlining the requirements for expenditure reporting submitted to the legislature by the DHHS Office of Substance Use and Mental Health to be made public on the DHHS website). See also Utah Code Ann. Sec. 26B-5-211(1)(b) (defining âopioid fundsâ to include opioid settlement funds received by the state or a political subdivision). â
(with an effective date of May 1, 2024). â